![]() |
Is old really better then new? - Printable Version +- Jiggmin's Village (https://jiggmin2.com/forums) +-- Forum: Village Central (https://jiggmin2.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Blogs (https://jiggmin2.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +--- Thread: Is old really better then new? (/showthread.php?tid=1210) |
Is old really better then new? - dotime - 4th October 2018 hmmm RE: Is old really better then new? - Zelante - 4th October 2018 It's debatable in some cases, but most of the time it depends on what we're talking about. Let us see, for example, automobile safety has definitely improved as opposed to the older automobile safety technology (Three-point seat belts, airbags, more effective crumple zones, and etc.) Then there are things such as video game physics. We take Need for Speed's vehicle handling physics, for example. As an arcade type racing game, the older games and their latest games had much more enjoyable physics compared to the handling physics in NFS 2015 which were made so over complicated that the cars randomly start moving sideways as if it were being controlled by a super strong magnetic force around it. RE: Is old really better then new? - Lego-man945 - 4th October 2018 PR2 > PR3 PR2 is older and is still better ![]() But it all depends on circumstances. RE: Is old really better then new? - ThePizzaEater1000 - 9th October 2018 (4th October 2018, 12:28 PM)Lego-man945 Wrote: PR2 > PR3 Ahem... PR3 is clearly superior. Far more conducive to creative and interesting concepts. RE: Is old really better then new? - bls1999 - 9th October 2018 (9th October 2018, 7:47 PM)ThePizzaEater1000 Wrote: Ahem... here we go RE: Is old really better then new? - fliker2 - 12th October 2018 PR1>PR3 RE: Is old really better then new? - xGuest - 13th October 2018 pr2=pr3... although pr2+pr3<pr1 |