20th November 2019, 5:36 PM
Pages: 1 2
20th November 2019, 5:41 PM
whats the new regulation?
20th November 2019, 5:46 PM
(20th November 2019, 5:41 PM)FlashRock Wrote: [ -> ]whats the new regulation?
That "Made for Kids" stuff
plus I'd rather not have old vids getting 1 view a month if that'd be a liability
20th November 2019, 6:29 PM
(20th November 2019, 5:46 PM)Camer the Dragon Wrote: [ -> ]That "Made for Kids" stuff
can you elaborate?
20th November 2019, 8:07 PM
(20th November 2019, 6:29 PM)David Wrote: [ -> ]can you elaborate?
20th November 2019, 10:19 PM
Regurgitated from Acid Forums:
Youtube was found to be in violation of the United States' Children's Online Policy Act (COPPA) by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). For context this is the same law that was enforced on JV (and is on JV2) that did not allow children under thirteen to register and be registered on the site without their parents permission. If someone said they were under thirteen (even as a joke), they would get banned until their thirteenth birthday.
Youtube cannot have collect data and target ads for children under thirteen. This causes content creators specializing in videos for younger people to lose revenue because targeted ads bring more revenue than general ads. There are also other restrictions on videos aimed at children. Creators have to specifically mark if one of their videos is aimed at children. If they do not do this and the FTC deems them in violation, the FTC will give them a fine of (so far seeing) $42,350 per video in violation.
There is also the issue of what constitutes "videos aimed at children" and content creators are worrying about if they will get affected (for example, gaming channels) (I think Camer is falling under this instant since Youtube can likely say PR2 videos are aimed at children).
Here is an article on this and a video from Youtube describing how content creators must comply:
https://nerdist.com/article/youtube-ftc-...emonetize/
Youtube was found to be in violation of the United States' Children's Online Policy Act (COPPA) by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). For context this is the same law that was enforced on JV (and is on JV2) that did not allow children under thirteen to register and be registered on the site without their parents permission. If someone said they were under thirteen (even as a joke), they would get banned until their thirteenth birthday.
Youtube cannot have collect data and target ads for children under thirteen. This causes content creators specializing in videos for younger people to lose revenue because targeted ads bring more revenue than general ads. There are also other restrictions on videos aimed at children. Creators have to specifically mark if one of their videos is aimed at children. If they do not do this and the FTC deems them in violation, the FTC will give them a fine of (so far seeing) $42,350 per video in violation.
There is also the issue of what constitutes "videos aimed at children" and content creators are worrying about if they will get affected (for example, gaming channels) (I think Camer is falling under this instant since Youtube can likely say PR2 videos are aimed at children).
Here is an article on this and a video from Youtube describing how content creators must comply:
https://nerdist.com/article/youtube-ftc-...emonetize/
21st November 2019, 1:37 AM
(20th November 2019, 10:19 PM)Uptight 534 Wrote: [ -> ]Regurgitated from Acid Forums:
Youtube was found to be in violation of the United States' Children's Online Policy Act (COPPA) by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). For context this is the same law that was enforced on JV (and is on JV2) that did not allow children under thirteen to register and be registered on the site without their parents permission. If someone said they were under thirteen (even as a joke), they would get banned until their thirteenth birthday.
Youtube cannot have collect data and target ads for children under thirteen. This causes content creators specializing in videos for younger people to lose revenue because targeted ads bring more revenue than general ads. There are also other restrictions on videos aimed at children. Creators have to specifically mark if one of their videos is aimed at children. If they do not do this and the FTC deems them in violation, the FTC will give them a fine of (so far seeing) $42,350 per video in violation.
There is also the issue of what constitutes "videos aimed at children" and content creators are worrying about if they will get affected (for example, gaming channels) (I think Camer is falling under this instant since Youtube can likely say PR2 videos are aimed at children).
Here is an article on this and a video from Youtube describing how content creators must comply:
https://nerdist.com/article/youtube-ftc-...emonetize/
On the brightside, if that is true, Jake Paul goes out of business (if it's the guy I connect with the name).
21st November 2019, 10:36 AM
Honestly the SAR videos were the big problem (although PR2 a bit too with lasers and swords), so I just decided safest is remove all the vids from YT. I have them if I ever wanted to reupload them.
21st November 2019, 11:09 AM
Why cant you mark them “for kids”?
21st November 2019, 11:19 AM
(21st November 2019, 11:09 AM)platform guy Wrote: [ -> ]Why cant you mark them “for kids”?
It's too confusing and annoying to deal with
I'd rather not
also if YT is gonna be like this may as well not have vids on their platform
21st November 2019, 9:42 PM
I marked my PR3 vids not for kids, although I guess thats a bit more clear cut considering the chat gets quite interesting during a tournament
21st November 2019, 10:00 PM
(21st November 2019, 9:42 PM)ThePizzaEater1000 Wrote: [ -> ]I marked my PR3 vids not for kids, although I guess thats a bit more clear cut considering the chat gets quite interesting during a tournamentLOL I bet
21st November 2019, 10:13 PM
(21st November 2019, 10:00 PM)Lego-man945 Wrote: [ -> ]LOL I betYe I remember at least one video mentions redacted, which isn't usually something you think of when you think "kids video"
22nd November 2019, 1:49 AM
(21st November 2019, 10:13 PM)ThePizzaEater1000 Wrote: [ -> ]Ye I remember at least one video mentions redacted, which isn't usually something you think of when you think "kids video"
I don't think I want to know what redacted is
22nd November 2019, 11:22 AM
(21st November 2019, 9:42 PM)ThePizzaEater1000 Wrote: [ -> ]I marked my PR3 vids not for kids, although I guess thats a bit more clear cut considering the chat gets quite interesting during a tournament
The problem is a lot of this stuff is done with bots
they might see PR3 and go "kids game" and mark as such and get mad that you didn't
23rd November 2019, 6:49 AM
(22nd November 2019, 10:48 PM)ThePizzaEater1000 Wrote: [ -> ]quote removed
I hate you
14th December 2019, 12:27 PM
Poor Jiggmin I hope his TEXT TOOL video doesn't get deleted
14th December 2019, 12:36 PM
(14th December 2019, 12:27 PM)Chma Wrote: [ -> ]Poor Jiggmin I hope his TEXT TOOL video doesn't get deleted
omg I'd be so sad if any Jigg video went, they're all classics
14th December 2019, 1:00 PM
is it possible to use web archive to look at youtube videos that have been deleted?
17th December 2019, 4:16 PM
You can use any youtube to mp4 service to save them
Does anyone know where to find jiggmin’s pr2 streams? I remember one moment where he was talking while on the campaign tab and everyone was filling in every level slot just to be in the video
Does anyone know where to find jiggmin’s pr2 streams? I remember one moment where he was talking while on the campaign tab and everyone was filling in every level slot just to be in the video
Pages: 1 2