U.S. 2nd Amendment

[Uptight 534]

The law was written in the late 1700s so those are the only guns you should be allowed
and it says "arms" so it can be limited to 2 without breaking the constitution if it has to be stuck to

The First Amendment was written in the late 1700s so only media mediums during those times should be allowed free speech protection under the First Amendment. If people (for whatever weird reason) wanted to use media mediums (Internet, delivering news via trucks, cars, airplanes, etc., digital billboard screens) made over 200 years later than what the people who wrote that rule had in mind, than free speech should not be protected in those mediums. 

We can play this game if you want. 

Time to give my crappy opinion because I hurled myself into this. There should definitely be firearm regulation and seeing the whole “I gotta protect myself with my whole *name off entire arsenal of weapons*,” when you live in a white picket fence subdivision is laughable. However, the whole “We need to ban them all,” is just preposterous, since they are so entrenched in the culture of the United States, they are tools in various regions of the United States (e.g. wild boar conservation) and, plot twist, criminals are not going to give up firearms (add to that if they are illegally obtained). 

Honestly, I do not have too thorough of an opinion because the debate is just a whole ass blast that is not going anywhere. Plus, it is not like Congress is going to do anything about it. If the option was between healthcare and firearms, I am taking healthcare any day of the week.