4th May 2022, 12:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 4th May 2022, 12:25 PM by Camer the Dragon. Edited 2 times in total.)
(3rd May 2022, 2:41 PM)David Wrote:
There's no weird reason, the idea is that civilians have access to the same small arms as the military which obviously changes over time. In the unlikely event of a tyrannical government you should be on an even playing field when it comes to person-person combat
Ah ok
This seems like kinda overkill though
(3rd May 2022, 4:21 PM)Uptight 534 Wrote: The First Amendment was written in the late 1700s so only media mediums during those times should be allowed free speech protection under the First Amendment. If people (for whatever weird reason) wanted to use media mediums (Internet, delivering news via trucks, cars, airplanes, etc., digital billboard screens) made over 200 years later than what the people who wrote that rule had in mind, than free speech should not be protected in those mediums.
Ah ye good point
(3rd May 2022, 4:21 PM)Uptight 534 Wrote: However, the whole “We need to ban them all,” is just preposterous, since they are so entrenched in the culture of the United States, they are tools in various regions of the United States (e.g. wild boar conservation) and, plot twist, criminals are not going to give up firearms (add to that if they are illegally obtained).
Yeah once they are in it is pretty much impossible to get them all out and it'd just increase the percentage of people who own guns that are bad since a lot of the people who wouldn't use them for bad would give them up possibly
á