9th June 2019, 6:57 PM
I actually believe the majority of the rules are pretty good standards to follow. However, I believe they should not be completely followed. Although strictly following the rules can be seen as a good way to stay objective, not everything is black and white when determining a warning/ban. There are instances when it hard to determine if something warrants a warning/ban.
For example, if someone purposefully breaks the rules to show how unreasonable the pr2 rules are, I believe warning/banning them could just reinforce their current viewpoint.
I believe the problem is, whenever someone breaks the rules, they are usually warned/banned, regardless of the context.
Also, a suggestion:
For chat bans, maybe having mods/admins type out a warning before banning/silencing someone in the chat can be enough to resolve the issue and maybe leave a better impression.
For example, if someone purposefully breaks the rules to show how unreasonable the pr2 rules are, I believe warning/banning them could just reinforce their current viewpoint.
I believe the problem is, whenever someone breaks the rules, they are usually warned/banned, regardless of the context.
Also, a suggestion:
For chat bans, maybe having mods/admins type out a warning before banning/silencing someone in the chat can be enough to resolve the issue and maybe leave a better impression.
